← All alternatives

A MaxMind alternative built around live lookups

MaxMind popularised the downloadable GeoIP database, and for offline batch work that model still makes sense. It is a poor fit when you need a verdict at the moment a request arrives: databases go stale between refreshes, cloud providers reassign ranges weekly, and someone on your team ends up owning an update pipeline nobody wanted. Guarda takes the opposite approach — one HTTPS call, current data, geolocation and proxy detection in the same JSON object.

Who should consider switching

  • Teams maintaining a GeoIP2 database download, extract and reload job they would rather delete.
  • Products that need a decision inside a request cycle rather than in a nightly batch.
  • Anyone paying separately for geolocation data and for a fraud or proxy signal.
  • Smaller teams for whom enterprise licensing tiers and per-seat database entitlements are overkill.
  • Privacy-sensitive deployments where the vendor must not retain the addresses being checked.

Where Guarda works differently from MaxMind

Nothing to download, nothing to schedule

There is no binary database, no weekly refresh window and no version skew between your staging and production copies. Every call reads current data, so a range that was reassigned to a hosting provider yesterday is classified as hosting today.

Location and risk in one response

Country, region, city, postal code, coordinates, timezone and currency arrive alongside the proxy, VPN, TOR, hosting, residential and cellular flags. You do not need to join a geolocation product with a separate fraud product to make a decision.

An explainable score, not a black box

Every lookup returns a risk level plus the specific reasons behind it — TOR exit node, commercial VPN operator, datacenter ASN, known abuser — so you can justify a decline to a customer or a reviewer instead of quoting a number nobody can interrogate.

Results are never stored

We do not write lookup results, queried addresses or per-request logs to any database. Billing runs on anonymous daily counters. That materially shortens the data-processing section of a vendor review.

Flat, predictable pricing

Plans are priced on monthly query volume with the full field set included. There is no premium tier that unlocks the accuracy or the anonymiser flags you actually came for.

Data you get on every lookup

Country, country code and continent context
Region, state code, city and postal code
Latitude, longitude, timezone and currency
ASN, ISP, organisation and domain
Reverse hostname where available
Connection type and cellular detection
Proxy, VPN, TOR and web proxy flags
Hosting, datacenter and residential classification
Search-bot identification
Risk score, risk level and reasons

Being straight with you

MaxMind has been at this for two decades and its enterprise footprint shows: local database distribution for air-gapped environments, a long-established minFraud scoring product with transaction-level features, and contractual arrangements that large procurement teams already recognise. If you need offline lookups with no outbound network call, or scoring that consumes card and order attributes rather than the connection alone, that is not what Guarda does. We are a live IP intelligence API, and we would rather say so than pretend otherwise.

How a migration usually goes

  1. 1.Map the fields you actually read

    Most GeoIP2 integrations consume a handful of fields — country, city, ASN, and sometimes the anonymous-IP flags. List them, and match each one to its Guarda equivalent in the API reference. The response is flat JSON with snake_case keys.

  2. 2.Shadow both sources for a week

    Call Guarda alongside your existing lookup and log both verdicts without changing any decision. A week of real traffic tells you exactly where the two disagree and whether those disagreements matter for your rules.

  3. 3.Move the thresholds, then cut over

    Re-tune your rules against the observed risk distribution — not against the old vendor's scale — then switch the decision path over and retire the database refresh job.

Try it against your own traffic

Run a sample of addresses through the bulk tool, compare the verdicts with what you get today, and only then decide.